Via
Libertad20.es
consider
1 .- copyrights are nothing more than the argument by the government to introduce censorship and freedom of expression liquidate. We are not in a battle against the creators but a struggle for the defense of our freedoms and civil rights.
2 .- copyright and intellectual property can not in any way violate fundamental rights citizens can not admit that his name is settled law.
3 .- The freedom of expression or information is not in an open society, be left to an administrative commission to decide which blogs / sites have a right to exist and which not. And such is the extent that the government has introduced legal plunder called "Law of Sustainable Economy", in articulating the Second Section (SS), which will be a commission of political appointees to decide what content is acceptable and what is not .
4 .- An increase of freedom in the exchange of information can never be achieved by political means, but by the development of new communication technologies. Internet offers for the first time in history the ability to communicate from citizen to citizen in a multimedia. In this way the owners of traditional media, clearly influenced by political lobbying and / or lose their government-monopoly position and "gatekeepers" of information. Professional journalists have to face competition on the Internet was born, which is already effective tool in verifying the veracity of the newspaper claims.
understand that since the Sustainable Economy Act is intended, above all, safeguard the rights and privileges of those who traditionally have contributed to the establishment of appropriate political channels to their own interests and not the veracity of the information service.
5 .- The links in no way constitute a crime, as has been repeatedly stressed the English courts and there is a right to private copying from the government, lobbies and delivered under pressure, is to criminalize. Internet users are "pirates", states in power and their media terminals.
6 .- The free, voluntary exchange of files (such as books or discs) is not only a crime, but defined as such is an attack freedom of citizens.
7 .- As stated in the manifesto in defense of fundamental rights on the Internet , signed by hundreds of thousands of citizens, " try to hold legislative changes to an outdated industry that can adapt to this new environment is neither fair nor realistic. If your business model is based on the control of the copies of the works and the Internet is not possible without violating fundamental rights, should look for another model. "
8 .- The model proposed by the socialist government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero will, by the growing indifference of citizens to them and what to this day represent to ruin a few artists, whose right of establishment violates the law, deceived by their increasingly wealthy management entities. Furthermore, by introducing legal uncertainty will be considerably harmful among entrepreneurs.
Therefore
1 .- We demand the immediate withdrawal of the first final provision of Law Sustainable Economy and the resignation of the ministers responsible for committing this violation of freedom of citizens, Elena Salgado and Angeles Gonzalez-Sinde.
2 .- Likewise we demand the immediate withdrawal of digital canon, to criminalize citizens assuming that they will commit a crime and imposing a tax, yet another, on the population in order to maintain the privileged caste politics.
3 .- To amend the legislation so that entities of copyright management can no longer exert intolerable pressure on the public and immediately be audited the accounts of all these entities.
4 .- We encourage citizens to promote this show by any means available to them and to give maximum publicity to national and international level and to cooperate with any initiative launched against the "Law Economy Sustainable. " Related
WEB
FACEBOOK TWITTER
