Here's a striking story: the Church is not required to remove the rebels from the books of baptism.
Following a citizen complaint, the agency asked for data protection in 2006 the Archbishop of Valencia, deleting data, or the recording of casualties in the books of baptisms, of people who express their desire to stop belong to the Catholic Church.
Faced with a situation seemingly logical and simple, the Archbishop, displaying consistency that characterizes them, are refused, and filed an appeal which was granted by the Supreme Court and, finally, we have given the reason: apparently, a "baptismal" can not be considered a "file" , therefore, the law does not apply.
Leaving aside the administration of justice, which does not concern me and which I hope (for the account that brings us) what surprises me is the starting point: the Church by bringing an action to avoid having to erase from their lists people who have made it clear they despise, ignore or simply do not share their beliefs.
What they are really saying aloud is not mind having in their ranks to hordes of apostates, heretics, or whatever you call them, what matters is the number, have them at the end of the day. What legitimacy, if they still have some that can then defend their ideas Cretaceous claiming that represent a percentage of the population false?
I'm sure this is the morality that God wanted for their representatives on earth. Hope I have done the experiment in another galaxy, because we have been mistaken.